|
This past February 6 to 21, five members
of the Global Peacemakers Association (GPA)
travelled to India and Pakistan, now threatening
each other with nuclear weapons over the
disputed province of Kashmir. We travelled
to Mumbai, Ahmedabad, and New Delhi in India,
then to Lahore, Islamabad, and Karachi in
Pakistan to experiment with our A-bomb presentation,
advocate the banning of nuclear weapons,
and talk with peace organizations about how
the people of Hiroshima can help to defuse
enmity and strengthen local peace movements.
I came home from this trip frightened, sad,
and hopeful. I was frightened by Dr. Inayatullah,
one of Pakistan's best-known physicists,
who explained convincingly why India and
Pakistan's nuclear weapons are far more likely
to be used than those of the US and Russia.
I was frightened also by a newspaper article
that appeared in the very first Pakistani
newspaper I saw. I quote Saeed Ismat, a "retired
brigadier and former ambassador of Pakistan."
"... let us visualize an Indian military
invasion through the Rajistan desert.....In
conjunction with offensives in other areas
as well, they could prolong the war and go
for our areas in depth. All of Pakistan options
[sic] would have foreclosed-except one! We
should have a well defined and declared strategy
of using our ultimate choice of nuclear weapons,
aimed at the destruction of those military
forces which have intruded in our territory.
Our aim should be the destruction of the
invading military forces only and not civilian
population." Clearly, this former ambassador
is either ignorant of the nature of nuclear
war or deliberately misleading the public
to foment fear of India and trust in nuclear
weapons. Either way, he is frightening.
I came home sad because of what this ridiculous
50-year arms race has done and is doing to
the people of these great countries. Both
India and Pakistan are far richer than Japan
in natural resources. Their people are every
bit as intelligent. But neither country has
succeeded in lifting its people out of degrading,
embarrassing poverty-the kind of poverty
that keeps the streets full of shacks and
beggars and forces government officials to
seek bribes just to make a living. I came
home sad because the ordinary people of India
and Pakistan are so pathetically ignorant
about each other. Each group actually thinks,
"We are peaceloving people. Have been
for centuries. We want no trouble with anyone,
but the enemy will attack if we let down
our defense." Both groups are being
taught to hate and fear each other, yet the
vast majority have no real ill will against
anyone. In Pakistan, when we were asked what
the Indians had said about them and reported
that most had sent them best wishes for peace
and cooperation (which is true), many in
the audience actually beamed with pleasure.
I came home hopeful because of one Pakistani
college student in particular. After our
presentation of A-bomb slides and a survivor
story she said, "I know nuclear weapons
are horrible, but how can we protect ourselves
without them?" I said, "You have
to abandon the whole idea that India is your
enemy. The idea of fighting and winning or
losing is obsolete. The only way you can
win is if India wins also, and the only way
you can protect yourself is by making friends."
She looked doubtful. "If your country
put half the money and thought it puts into
protecting itself into making friends, Pakistan
and India would be friends in no time. And
then, you would be safe." Her face softened.
She smiled and said, "Thank you."
Hiroshima has made the shift. Hiroshima knows
that nuclear weapons, war, jealousy, hatred
and fear are the only true enemies. All talk
of other enemies is primitive, atavistic
nonsense. Winning and losing must be confined
to sports, movies, and soft drink companies.
In the world of politics and international
relations, we can no longer afford to think
of winning or even competing. We have time
for nothing but working together to solve
our myriad problems to the genuine satisfaction
of all. The GPA trip confirmed that young
Hiroshimians, especially those who speak
English fluently, can tell the survivors'
stories extremely effectively. They can and
must continue to carry the light of peace
to the furthest, darkest reaches of enmity.
My hope is that this city and the people
in it will get serious about and competent
at spreading the spirit of Hiroshima through
a world that needs and wants peace but where
too many leaders still capitalize on the
excitement, unity, and profits derived from
war.
Making a presentation to SMILE, a group of
activists in New Dehli |